Legal Opinion

Bendetson v. Building Inspector of Revere

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 6, 1994No. 93-P-463PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.

We must decide whether, as the defendant argues, the present action in the nature of mandamus to compel the building inspector of the city of Revere to enforce the Revere zoning ordinance is barred by claim preclusion. 2 We conclude that the doctrine does apply to these proceed ings, and that the judge was correct in allowing the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and thereafter entering a final judgment for the defendant.

1. Prior proceedings. On February 28, 1990, Ralph Caruso and Stephen Caruso, trustees of the R&S Realty Trust, filed a verified complaint in the Land Court against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Saint Louis v. Baystate Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co. v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Mancuso v. KinchlaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Horner v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Charlette v. Charlette Bros. Foundry, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Tinkham v. Jenny Craig, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API