Legal Opinion

Hale v. Cox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1935No. 7 Div. 334PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The case is that of contest of a will where there was a jury and verdict rendered in the trial of an issue out of chancery after probate.

See reports on former appeals: Cox v. Hale et al., 217 Ala. 46, 114 So. 465; Hale et al. v. Cox, 222 Ala. 136, 131 So. 233.

The jury found the issue in favor of the complainant.

On the first appeal, seeming or apparent conflict between items 2 and 4 of the will called for construction, were reconciled, and it was held the general devise to the wife and children did not defeat the specific devise to complainant, the daughter of a former…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Coghill v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Councill v. MayhewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Steele v. Steele's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Turcotte v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Orton v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Whitt v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API