Legal Opinion
Stewart v. US Ex Rel. Dept. of Agriculture
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 13, 2009No. Civil 07-6282-TCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MICHAEL R. HOGAN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on May 20, 2009, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.