Koop v. Independent School District No. 624
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Elizabeth Kay Koop seeks attorney fees as a prevailing party pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.14, subd. 3 (1992). She challenges the district court’s determination that her attorney fees are not “costs” in an offer of judgment made and accepted pursuant to Minn. R.Civ.P. 68. We affirm as modified and remand.
FACTS
In July 1991, Koop, a custodian at South High School in White Bear Lake, sued her employer, respondent Independent School District No. 624, alleging sexual harassment, a hostile work environment and retaliation. Koop alleges…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Curtis Cowan v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Chicano Police Officer's Ass'n v. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Giuliani v. Stuart Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hallow v. FiliyaroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995