Legal Opinion
State v. Bromell
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 30, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 85 (1991)
596 A.2d 1105
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DOUGLAS BROMELL AND EDWIN G. MEIER, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal), Monmouth County.
Decided May 30, 1991.
John P. Johnston for plaintiff (John A. Kaye, Prosecutor of Monmouth County, attorney).
James Fagen, for defendant, Douglas Bromell.
Joseph Hrymack, for defendant, Edwin Meier.
O'HAGAN, J.S.C.
The defendants Douglas Bromell and Edwin Meier, by way of motion to suppress pursuant to R. 3:5-7, seek to suppress evidence seized by members of the auto theft unit of the New Jersey State Police…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CalvertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Drakes Collision, Inc. v. Auto Club Group Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- State v. WhiteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002