Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Parker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1909No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Case by Martin Rogers and another against George W. Parker for negligently allowing fire to escape upon plaintiff’s premises. A judgment for plaintiffs is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, C. J.

Action on the case to recover damages for destruction of property on plaintiffs’ farm by fire alleged to have been negligently permitted to escape from defendant’s premises. Defendant, being the owner of a tract of 80 acres, of which about one-half was cleared land, and the other half wild land, made a verbal arrangement with one Crawford, whereby Crawford was to crop the land for two-thirds of the crop.' After Crawford had gone into possession, defendant agreed that “he would give me three dollars an acre for all the land I would clear.” There was a conflict in the evidence as to whether the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. YonleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  3. Kellogg v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Shute v. Princeton TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Boyd v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. West v. National Mines Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. DeShambo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cary v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API