Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 28, 2016No. AC 12-P-719PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.

After a jury trial, the defendants, Markeese Mitchell, Terrance Pabon, and Pedro Ortiz were convicted of murder in the second degree in connection with the stabbing death of Terrance Jacobs. Paul Goode also was indicted, tried with the defendants, and convicted of murder in the second degree. Goode’s direct appeal originally was consolidated with the others; however, by motion and pursuant to an order of this court, Goode’s appeal was severed. Goode’s statement to the police was admitted at trial and is the predicate for one of the defendants’ common claims of error, under Bruton v. United…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TelcinordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  3. COMMONWEALTH v. MARKEESE MITCHELL (And Two Companion Cases)Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
  4. Commonwealth v. GadwahMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API