State Farm Insurance Companies v. Willie Lee Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Upon ample evidence the District Court in an opinion, Thompson v. State Farm Insurance Companies, D.C.La., 145 F.Supp. 473, which we approve as it relates to the limited matter now before us, by findings of fact which withstand the scrutiny of “clearly erroneous,” Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C.A., and a correct statement of applicable Louisiana principles of law, held that the first policy was still in force and effect, had not been superseded by the second one, and had not been terminated by cancellation of the second one.
We reject, as did the District Court, the suggestion that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phoenix Indemnity Company and Joseph Jurisich Marine Service, Inc. v. Marquette Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Easley v. Boston Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Phoenix Indemnity Company and Joseph Jurisich Marine Service, Inc. v. Marquette Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963