Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided August 22, 2003No. CIV.A. 3:03CV6LNPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the motion of plaintiffs to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447. Defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (NMAC) has responded in opposition to the motion and has filed an alternative motion to certify order for appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The court, having considered the memoranda of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, concludes that plaintiffs’ motion to remand should be granted, and further concludes that NMAC’s motion for certification for interlocutory appeal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abraham v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2016
- Garner v. BANKPLUSDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012