Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Spears

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1918No. 6073PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; J. T. Sluder, Judge. . Action by the City of San Antonio against Noa Spears and wife. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund', J.

The city of San Antonio sued Noa Spears and his wife, May H. Spears, for the use and benefit of the Texas Bitulithic Company, to collect a certain assignable certificate of special assessment for $228.65, issued by said city on May 10, 1915, to said company, for the pro rata part of the cost of paving a street in said city' on which defendants have their residence. The certificate recites that the assessment was levied against the real estate on which defendants resided, and also against May H. and Noa Spears as a personal liability.

The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. BordagesTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Eubank v. City of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Lewis v. Roach Manigan Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noa Spears and Wife v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Frankenstein v. Rushmore GowdyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. City of Sweetwater v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Prager v. WoottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API