Legal Opinion

Hecht v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint because plaintiff failed to file a notice of claim as required by Syracuse City Charter § 8-115 (2). Compli*959anee with that section’s notice of claim requirement, “unless waived, is a condition precedent to the commencement of litigation against the City” (Davis-Wallbridge, Inc. v City of Syracuse, 71 NY2d 842, 843, rearg denied 72 NY2d 841). There is no express agreement that that section is inapplicable nor is there any indication the parties have set forth detailed procedures inconsistent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis-Wallbridge, Inc. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Hall-Kimbrell Environmental Services, Inc. v. East Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tom L. LaMere & Associates, Inc. v. City of Syracuse Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API