Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Richardson & Son

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1924No. 15233Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where there were five claimants to a fund in the hands of a sheriff, under a money rule, and the judge directed a verdict, upon which judgment was entered, awarding the fund to four of the claimants, to the exclusion of the fifth, each of the four was a necessary party defendant to a bill of exceptions brought by the fifth to review the verdict and judgment. Craig v. Webb, 70 Ga. 188 (1); Knox v. McCalla, 70 Ga. 725; Hall v. Davis, 129 Ga. 498 (59 S. E. 241); Civil Code (1910), § 6176.

2. Service of a bill of exceptions may be made by the sheriff of the county in which the ease was tried,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Teasley v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Craig v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Walter v. KiersteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Seliger v. Coker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API