Legal Opinion

Underhill v. Motes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1944No. 35,897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for loss of cows due to alleged poisoning and to recover the first half of a pasture rental payment made by plaintiffs to defendants. The defendants appeal.

The appeal is from (1) an order granting a new trial; (2) an order overruling a demurrer of one of the defendants to plaintiff’s evidence; and (3) a ruling setting aside a previous order sustaining the demurrer of the other defendant to plaintiffs’ evidence.

Appellees and appellants are farmers. L. R. Underhill and Paul Underhill, appellees, are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Blake v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Brown v. City of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Lord v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Lundberg v. BolonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Underhill v. MotesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API