Legal Opinion

Phrazer Co. v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 14, 1987No. 86-1029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

Phrazer appeals the entry of a summary final judgment in its breach of contract action based on a title policy issued to it by appellee. Because the record supports the trial court’s determination that, as a matter of law, there was no breach of the title insurance policy as written, we affirm the judgment.

However, the record reveals that the appellants may have a cause of action against appellee as closing agent in the real estate transaction which resulted in the issuance of the title insurance policy.

On this appeal, Phrazer contends that appellee breached its duty as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coudry v. City of TitusvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. FLORIDA AIR CONDITIONERS v. Colonial SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Don Suntan Corporation v. TANNING RESEARCH LAB., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sommers v. Smith and Berman, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Arky, Freed v. Bowmar InstrumentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. DyessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API