Carson v. Sutton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendants contend that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. In support of their contention, defendants advance the arguments (1) that the supporting affidavits are “merely reiterative” of the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint and (2) that the supporting affidavits are “inherently suspect”.
Summary judgment may be granted where “the pleadings . . . together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Liberty Loan Corp. of North Charlotte v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holley v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Smith v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Van Reypen Associates, Inc. v. TeeterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. TalfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.