Garcia v. Crossmark, Inc.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Crossmark, Inc.’s (“Cross-mark”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 81] and Crossmark’s Motion in Limine [Doc. 83]. The Court, having considered the Motions, briefs, relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that both the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion in Limine are well-taken in part and therefore will be GRANTED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
This case was born in Philadelphia more than three years ago as part of a putative Fair Labor Standards Act…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Varnell v. Dora Consolidated School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Singh v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armijo v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Clark v. ACE AFSCME Local 2250District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Mayhew v. Angmar Medical Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Owen v. Audubon Field Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
- Wiltech Technology, Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021