Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1941No. O-3611Published

1Opinion of the Court

Railroad Commission of Texae Gentlemen I Opinion No. O-3611' Rer Validlty'of "grand-father" Provision in-H. B. 351, 47th Leg., and aonstruotlon to be placed thereon, In your letter of recent date you direot atten- tion to House'Bi.11 NO. 351, Forty-seventh Legislature, and advise us of the following facts: " . heretofore the Railroad Commission of Texis'ln the issuanoe of special oommodlty permite has not only not required pleadinga and proof that the pub110 oonvenisnoe and necessity required the operations aontemplated by said permits but haa not permitted such pleadings and proof;, and said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Golden Gate Ferry Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API