Legal Opinion

Levitt v. Simco Sales Service of Penna., Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 14, 1957No. 606PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

The substantive, and principal, question for decision is whether an action for personal injuries, loss of consortium and medical expenses is barred by a judgment rendered in a separate suit involving the same parties for property damage resulting from one and the same collision.

Mr. Levitt, accompanied by his wife, was driving his car in Delaware when it collided with a truck driven by Cookenmaster and owned by Simco. Levitt’s car was covered by a ISO-deductible collision insurance policy under which he received an amount equal to his repair bill less $50. The policy contained the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Dearden v. HeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Hayward v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warner v. HedrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Di Fonzo v. Robelen Piano CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1958
  3. American Insurance v. Ellsworth Freight Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
  5. Levitt v. SIMCO SALES SERVICE OF PENNASuperior Court of Delaware · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API