Legal Opinion

Suarez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1987No. 86-1481Published

1Per curiam

The final order under review denying the defendant Jose Fernando Suarez’ motion to vacate his judgments of conviction and sentences under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 is affirmed. We reach this result because the trial court, on this record, was privileged to find that: (a) the defendant freely and voluntarily decided not to testify at his trial upon professionally sound advice of counsel, and (b) counsel in no way coerced the defendant into accepting the advice not to testify. This being so, the defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense by testifying in his own behalf was not, as urged,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API