Legal Opinion

Tremblay v. Land Use Regulation Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 13, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] Gabriel and Katherine Tremblay appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) in which the court affirmed the decision of the Land Use Regulation Commission approving a six-lot subdivision on land owned by John Hofmann. The Tremblays, whose land abuts the Hofmann land, argue, inter alia, that LURC erred in approving the subdivision without considering the alleged earlier illegal subdivision of John Hofmann’s land. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] In May 2003, LURC granted John Hofinann’s application for subdivision ap…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S.D. Warren Co. v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Suzman v. Commissioner, Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. Tinsman v. Town of FalmouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rangeley Crossroads Coalition v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Maine School Administrative District No. 27 v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. McClintock v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Town of Warren Ambulance Service v. Department of Public Safety, Maine Emergency Medical ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Rangeley Crossroads Coalition v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API