Legal Opinion

In re City Electric Supply, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1968No. 66-BK-1371Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Order of September 18, 1968, Sustaining Referee’s Order, and Motion for Hearing on Petition for Review as Required by General Order 47, filed herein by the Respondent, Helen Nott, the Court finds that both Motions should be denied for the following reasons:

1. With reference to the matter being reviewed by the Court, there were no factual disputes between the parties and only a legal question was involved. The Court was not required to conduct a hearing but nonetheless afforded the parties a hearing on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. KublerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. In Re PearlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. In re Graco, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API