Legal Opinion

United States v. One Lot of Eighteen Firearms

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 28, 1971No. 1:09-adr-00004PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOWNES, District Judge.

This is an action for forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) (Supp. V 1969) of a lot of eighteen firearms. Jurisdiction is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1355 (1964). Edmond Briand, owner of the firearms, intervened as a defendant. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Edmond Briand bought a firearm from Riley’s Sport Shop in Hooksett, New Hampshire, on January 11, 1969. He signed Internal Revenue Service Form 4473 (12-68) certifying he was not a felon prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 921 et seq. (Supp. V 1969) from purchasing a firearm.

The agreed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Knote v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. United States v. Howell F. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Earl Roy Cooper v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi and Leflore County, Mississippi, Earl Roy Cooper v. City of Greenwood, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Wallace F. Thrall v. Cecil M. Wolfe, Regional Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. FassnachtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. United States v. Clifford Ray SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API