United States v. One Lot of Eighteen Firearms
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOWNES, District Judge.
This is an action for forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) (Supp. V 1969) of a lot of eighteen firearms. Jurisdiction is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1355 (1964). Edmond Briand, owner of the firearms, intervened as a defendant. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Edmond Briand bought a firearm from Riley’s Sport Shop in Hooksett, New Hampshire, on January 11, 1969. He signed Internal Revenue Service Form 4473 (12-68) certifying he was not a felon prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 921 et seq. (Supp. V 1969) from purchasing a firearm.
The agreed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Knote v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Howell F. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Earl Roy Cooper v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi and Leflore County, Mississippi, Earl Roy Cooper v. City of Greenwood, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Wallace F. Thrall v. Cecil M. Wolfe, Regional Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. FassnachtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- United States v. Clifford Ray SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.