Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Conliff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1978No. 78AP-401 and 78AP-402Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWhiteside, J.

Although I concur in the judgment insofar as it affirms the conviction of disorderly conduct and reverses the conviction of contempt, I must respectfully dissent from the judgment to the extent that it directs that defendant be discharged from the contempt order and would remand for a new trial upon that charge. Also, in keeping with App. R. 12(A), I feel that the first assignment of error should be considered on its merits rather than overruled as harmless, if error.

By the first assignment of error, defendant contends that the Common Pleas Court (not the trial court) erred in overruling his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. White v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API