Legal Opinion

State v. . Powers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Indictmemt, for a Misdemeanor', tried at Spring Term, 1876, of Cumberland Superior Court, before his Honor, Judge Buxton, and a jury.

Read the full summary

Indictmemt, for a Misdemeanor', tried at Spring Term, 1876, of Cumberland Superior Court, before his Honor, Judge Buxton, and a jury. Upon the trial in the Court below, the jury returned the following special verdict, to-wit: 1. They find that the defendant was, on the said 24th day of April, 1876, appointed, qualified and acting as Registrar of Voters for a municipal election, to be held in the town of Fayetteville, on the 1st Monday in May, 1876, for a Mayor and seven Commissioners. 2. That on said 24th day of April, 1876, the prosecutor made application to the defendant to be registered as…

1Opinion of the CourtReade, J.

Any officer in the State who is required, in entering upon his office, to take an oath of office, who shall wilfully omit, neglect or refuse to discharge any of the duties of his office, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. Bat. Rev., chap. 32, sec. 107.

It may be that “ officer in the State ” may mean State officers, as distinguished from town officers, or other officers; but it is not necessary to decide it in this case; because, taking the defendant to be within the statute, still we think he is not guilty.

The Act of 21st December, 1870, under which the defendant was acting as…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State v. . HeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Ex Parte AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API