De Morris v. Wilbur Lumber Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the circuit court for "Wauke-sha county: JaMes J. Dice, Circuit Judge. Action to enforce lien claims for labor performed in manufacturing logs into lumber and shingles and other products;, it was commenced against S. M. Holmes, the employer, and a writ of attachment was duly issued, under which, without any undertaking having been given as required in ordinary attachment proceedings for the collection of debts, a quantity of shingles which had been…
Read the full summary
Appeal from, a judgment of the circuit court for "Wauke-sha county: JaMes J. Dice, Circuit Judge. Action to enforce lien claims for labor performed in manufacturing logs into lumber and shingles and other products;, it was commenced against S. M. Holmes, the employer, and a writ of attachment was duly issued, under which, without any undertaking having been given as required in ordinary attachment proceedings for the collection of debts, a quantity of shingles which had been sold to the Wilbur Lumber Company and paid for by such company, without any notice, actual or constructive, of any lien…
1Opinion of the Court
MARSHALL, J".
Sec. 5, ch. 139, Laws ■ of 1891, being that part of the lien law under which this action was brought affecting the remedy by attachment, is sec. 3333, R. S. 1878, as it has come down from such revision through various reenactments with slight changes. The original punctuation of the section has been so changed that with the introduction by amendment of the words “ by any circuit court or judge thereof,” where hereafter indicated, the real intention in respect to the necessity for an undertaking on attachment in actions in the circuit court has been somewhat obscured. Restoring…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Willer v. BergenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Winslow v. UrquhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Kollock v. ParcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Hogan v. CushingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Spruhen v. StoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reindl v. HeathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Blonde v. Menominee Bay Shore Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900