Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 1959No. [P.C. No. 60, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

221 Md. 609 (1959)

156 A.2d 794

BURGESS

v.

WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[P.C. No. 60, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 22, 1959.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

2Per curiam

For the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Evans in the court below, this application for leave to appeal pursuant to the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act is denied. Any additional grounds not raised below, cannot now be considered on an application for leave to appeal. Code (1959 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, sec. 645H; Shifflett v. Warden, 220 Md. 667, 155…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shifflett v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Burgess v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Culley v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Burgess v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Matthews v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. White v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Jones v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API