Hall v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Accusation of selling liquor. Before Judge Carter. City court of Baxley. December 30, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtXa.ma.ii, J.
1. Where witnesses summoned by the defendant are present at the trial but are not examined, a new trial will not be granted on the ground that since the verdict the defendant has for the first time learned that they could have testified to facts material to his defense. Civil Code, § 5480.:2. A motion for a new trial on the ground of' newly discovered evidence is not intended to serve the purpose of cross-examination. Hence, a new trial will not be granted where- the sole witness for the State testified that he bought whisky from the defendant, and, after a verdict of guilty, made affidavit…
2Cited by12 opinions
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Kidwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Blackwell v. Houston CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Greer & Co. v. RaneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.