Legal Opinion

Priest v. Wells

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1922No. 6050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

This is an appeal presented upon an agreed statements of facts, pursuant to equity rule 77 (198 Eed. xli, 115 C. C. A. xli). The question involved is the right of the appellant to an allowance for his services as an attorney from the funds in the hands of the receiver. The allowance was denied by the trial court. Appellant was employed by the corporation as general counsel for the street railway system known as the United Railways Company of St. Louis (hereafter called railway company or company), for a period of one year from March 1, 1919, at a salary of $18,000 per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. St. Louis Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Burden Central Sugar-Refining Co. v. Ferris Sugar-Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
  4. Dodwell v. ReevesMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API