Legal Opinion
Engineered Data Products, Inc. v. Art Style Printing, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 16, 1999No. Civ.A. 96-K-2385PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING APPEAL OF ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This is the lead of four pending cases in this court involving claims of infringement of Plaintiff Engineered Data Products, Inc.’s (“EDP’s”) patents by Art Style Printing d/b/a/ Dataware (“Dataware”) on computer-generated label printing systems. Judge Walker D. Miller recently recused himself from the cases which were then reassigned to me. Various motions are pending, including Defendant’s motions for summary judgment; and Defendant’s motion to stay pending…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Skycom Corporation and Gerald M. Walters v. Telstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- New York Life Insurance v. K N Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Stice v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boskoff v. YanoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
- Planet Fitness International Franchise v. P JEG-United, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Planet Fitness International Franchise v. JEG-United, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022