Estate of Aaron v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Muedock, Judge:
The Commissioner does not argue that the condition of the health of the decedent in any way prompted the 1931 transfers, and clearly it did not. The justification for the determination that those transfers were made in contemplation of death must be found in the use and the terms of the trusts, the nature and possibilities of the property transferred, and the intent of the settlor shown by that and all other evidence in the record. The decedent was keen and intelligent. He knew what could be expected of the trusts. He knew that the income from, the securities which the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vanderlip v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Vanderlip v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
- Cronin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Garrett's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Ruthrauff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karagheusian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Estate of Platt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954