Legal Opinion

Union Of Concerned Scientists v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 4, 1988No. 86-1219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

840 F.2d 957

268 U.S.App.D.C. 250, 18 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,573

UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, et al., Petitioners,

v.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of

America, Respondents,

Nuclear Utility Backfitting and Reform Group, Intervenor. (Two Cases)

Nos. 85-1757, 86-1219.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

March 4, 1988.

Diane Curran, Andrea Ferster and Ellyn R. Weiss, Washington, D.C., were on petitioners' motion, for attorneys' fees and costs.

William H. Briggs, Jr., Solicitor, and G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Sr. Atty., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Washington,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Brigadier General Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Allende v. ShultzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API