Legal Opinion

Stuart v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 1967No. 11PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying the motion of appellant for judgment nunc pro tunc to reinstate the case on the docket of the trial court that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The prayer of appellant’s amended motion is as follows:

“WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff ROBERT C. STUART, individually in this cause of action, respectfully prays that the above numbered and entitled cause be reinstated on the docket of this Honorable Court nunc pro tunc in order that justice may be done and in order to allow Plaintiffs their day in Court.”

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Love v. State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Conley v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Mobley v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Drawe v. McGuffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Bolton v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Perry v. Nueces CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Div. v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Gray v. Turner, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1991
  5. Abu-Ahmad v. Shadowbrook ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API