Legal Opinion

McHenry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1901No. 2267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Charles F. Clint. Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, two "years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Ho statement of the facts of the case is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary; hence this appeal.

The State has made a motion to strike out the statement of facts on two grounds: (1) That the same is a substituted statement, and was not substituted at the next term after the appeal was taken, but at the next succeeding term; (2) it does not appear that the original statement of facts was filed within the ten days, as required by law. In support of the State’s contention we are referred to article 884, Code of Criminal Procedure. We do not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bigham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tankersley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Chumbley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API