Legal Opinion

Perries Irr. Dist. v. Escher

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1914No. 2357Published

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Olin Wellborn, Judge. Action at law by Conrad Escher and Louis Rahn, copartners doing business as Escher & Rahn, against the Perris Irrigation District. From an order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and to dismiss the action, defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

The question in this case is the same as that in Perris Irrigation District, a Corporation, v. R. B. Turnbull, Administrator of the Estate of R. H. Thompson, Deceased (No. 2356) 215 Fed. 562, 132 C. C. A. 74, and, for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perris Irr. Dist. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914