Legal Opinion

People v. Saunders

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1872PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Exceptions from Calboun Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, «T.

These defendants were indicted with one Winters for a conspiracy-to induce the firm of Amberg & Helmer, who were retail liquor dealers, to violate the United States revenue laws by a sale of a larger quantity of liquor than was allowed to be made by such dealers, in order that they might extort moneys from said Amberg & Helmer. Winters pleaded guilty, and the other defendants were put on trial. The prosecution claimed to have shown on the trial the conspiracy; that in pursuance thereof Winters bought of Amberg & Helmer six gallons of whisky; that the conspirators thereupon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bottomley v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840
  2. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. People v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Rankin v. BlackwellNew York Supreme Court · 1801

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. McCreaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. People v. AuerbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API