Legal Opinion

Fraher v. Inocencio

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 5, 1984No. 4-83-0280PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The trial court granted plaintiff Fraher a new trial in her suit to recover damages for her personal injuries and lost earnings caused by a car collision. This court granted the defendants’ petition for leave to appeal under Supreme Court Rule 306 (87 Ill. 2d R. 306). The property damage claims of plaintiff Fulk, whose car Fraher was driving and wrecked in the accident, have been concluded and are not at issue here.

The jury, instructed on comparative negligence, found that Fraher suffered $3,000 in damages and attributed to her 92% of the combined negligence, leaving a verdict of $240. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reidelberger v. Highland Body Shop, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Crutchfield v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Carr v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Bernesak v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Ross v. CortesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Co. v. McCartin-McAuliffe Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Skelton v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Hunter v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Dukes v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Durbin v. St. Louis Slag Products Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API