Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lana

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamilia, J.

¶ 1 On June 13, 1998, Philadelphia Officer Russell Shoemaker stopped appellant, Richard Lana, for suspicion of driving while intoxicated (DUI). In the course of providing the officer with his identification, a clear Baggie fell from appellant’s pocket. That Baggie later was ascertained to contain crack cocaine.

¶ 2 On July 12, 2001, in Municipal Court, appellant’s motion to suppress was denied and he was convicted, following a bench trial, of one count of possession of a controlled substance.1 He was sentenced that same day to six (6) months reporting probation followed by six (6) months…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. BattagliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. SnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SandsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Com. v. Hamilton, Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Com. v. Watley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API