Legal Opinion

Fougeres v. Murbarger

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided December 12, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The bill is multifarious. The complainants seek to enjoin and to recover damages for infringing their patent, and also to enjoin and to recover damages for the publication of slanderous circulars concerning the patent, and their rights thereunder. If entitled to relief at all, upon the facts stated, on account of the alleged slander, no good reason is shown why they should not seek it in a court of law. See Chase v. Tuttle, 27 Fed. Rep. 110; Kidd v. Horry, 28 Fed. Rep. 773; Car-Wheel, Co. v. Bemis, 29 Fed. Rep. 95; International Tooth Crown Co. v. Carmichael, 23 Ch. Legal News, 141; Francis…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Francis v. FlinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Edison v. EdisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1904
  3. Lyons v. DruckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  4. Fougeres v. JonesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API