Legal Opinion

United States v. Lorene Chittenden

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2018No. 14-4768; 14-4828; 15-4226; 15-4659PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREGORY, Chief Judge:

Lorene Chittenden was convicted of bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank and mail fraud for her role in a fraudulent mortgage scheme. Although Chittenden received only $231,000 in proceeds from these crimes, the district court ordered her to forfeit over $1 million to cover proceeds that her co-conspirators had received and dissipated. In United States v. Chittenden , 848 F.3d 188 (4th Cir. 2017), we affirmed Chittenden's conviction and sentence. The Supreme Court later decided Honeycutt v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1626 , 198 L.Ed.2d 73 (2017), vacated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Honeycutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. United States v. Antoine D. Washington, United States of America v. Glen Early, Jr., A/K/A William Kevin MarcusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Gerald BoutcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Nidal Ahmed Waked HatumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. BangiyevDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  5. Johnson v. USA - 2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API