Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Orbison

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

In this ease, Hill and Orbison, the appellees, sued Babcock ‡ Go. and recovered a judgment on an account.

The only questions presented in the case, arise upon a set off pleaded by the appellants, and they are very clearly and *76fully stated in the special findings of the court below, which are as follows, viz:

“ There is due to the plaintiffs from the defendants on the account set up in the complaint the sum of $136 80 with interest, in all $150 80,-which the plaintiffs are entitled to l’ecover.”
“In reference to the set off of the defendants, the following facts are found:
“ The plaintiffs are,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Covill v. Hill & SanfordNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Dows v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Fleeman v. McKeanNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Blossom v. ChampionNew York Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bishop v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Stults v. MiltenbergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API