Legal Opinion

Baptiste v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 1, 1992No. Docket No. 384-90UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

P, a beneficiary of insurance proceeds on decedent's life, was personally liable for decedent's unpaid estate tax to the extent of the value, at the time of decedent's death, of P's interest in the proceeds.

Read the full summary

P, a beneficiary of insurance proceeds on decedent's life, was personally liable for decedent's unpaid estate tax to the extent of the value, at the time of decedent's death, of P's interest in the proceeds. Held: A final Tax Court decision deciding the amount of estate tax imposed on the transfer of decedent's estate was res judicata for purposes of determining the amount of personal liability imposed on P pursuant to section 6324(a)(2); P's personal liability under section 6324(a)(2) constitutes a liability at law for purposes of section 6901(a)(1), thereby subjecting P to the method of…

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD M. BAPTISTE, TRANSFEREE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Baptiste v. Commissioner

Docket No. 384-90.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-198; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 2649;

April 1, 1992, Filed

P, a beneficiary of insurance proceeds on decedent's life, was personally liable for decedent's unpaid estate tax to the extent of the value, at the time of decedent's death, of P's interest in the proceeds. Held: A final Tax Court decision deciding the amount of estate tax imposed on the transfer of decedent's estate was res judicata for purposes of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  4. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. James D. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API