Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1903Published

1Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinion by

Smith, J.

While concurring in the reversal of the judgment, I feel constrained to place on record my dissent from the views, on some points, expressed in the opinion of the court.

There has never been any serious question respecting the conditions under which two or more acts, each an offense, may be charged in a single count. Briefly summarizing these, which are too well settled to require a citation of authorities, offenses may be joined when they arise from the same act or transaction, as a larceny of the property of two or more, the battery of two or more by a single…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutchison & Batchelder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Commonwealth v. BachopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Commonwealth v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  4. Commonwealth v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API