Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Branch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 2, 1973No. C-72-06-1896 CrPublished

1DissentThornton, J.

I am unable to agree with the majority that the entry by the officers into Room 310 was unlawful under all the facts and circumstances shown here.

The record is silent as to whether the officers asked permission to enter the room or whether the occupant consented to their entry. The trial judge made no clear finding on this point. In the absence of some evidence that their entry was forcible, or was *254resisted or objected to in some manner, I would hold that the entry was lawful.

Prior to going to the room, the facts and circumstances of which Sgt. Englert had reasonably trustworthy information…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API