Legal Opinion

Moyle v. . Hopkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Consideration of exceptive assignments in seriatim as brought forward in brief for plaintiff, appellant, fails to reveal prejudicial error.

Exceptions 1 and 2 are considered together. It appears that one Louise Simpson, witness for plaintiff, who gave testimony in corroboration of plaintiff’s version of bow tbe accident in question occurred, when being recalled for cross-examination, further testified that: “Up until I returned to Elizabeth City last year, I was at the Caswell Training School at Kinston.” Then, in answer to question, “I believe tbe Caswell Training School is a State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodall v. Western Wake Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Miller v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. In Re Will of BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Jones v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Rutherford Plantation, LLC v. Challenge Golf Group of the Carolinas, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API