Jackson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendant’s petition for habeas corpus is denied as frivolous and an abuse of process. It is well established that successive motions which were or could have been raised on appeal or in prior postcon-viction proceedings are procedurally barred. See, e.g., Rivera v. State, 728 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1998); Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986); Francois v. State, 470 So.2d 687 (Fla.1985); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Any further frivolous filings on the part of the petitioner will result in forfeiture of all or part of his gain time. § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rivera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Duncan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Francois v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- AmSouth Bank v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006