Gile v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. appeals from an order which struck from the amended answer of the defendant-appellant the affirmative defense of the three-year Statute of Limitations.
The first cause of action in the amended complaint is in negligence for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff on or about December 12,1949, as a result of plaintiff’s falling on a loosened floorboard alleged to have been left in that condition around a heat register, installed by the defendant-appellant on or about April 19,1948.
For her second cause of action, the plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Buyers v. Buffalo Paint & Specialties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Woodworth v. . Rice Brothers CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Cubito v. KreisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hargraves v. Brackett Stripping MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
- Leslie S. Barnes, Jr. v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.