Legal Opinion
EIDMANN v. WALGREEN CO.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 26, 2021No. 5:20-cv-04805Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CAMERON EIDMANN, 8 Case No. 5:20-cv-04805-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS 10 WALGREEN CO., Re: Dkt. No. 30 11 Defendant. 12 13 In this putative class action, Plaintiff Cameron Eidmann (“Eidmann”) alleges the 14 marketing of Defendant Walgreen Co.’s (“Walgreens”) Infants’ Pain & Fever Acetaminophen is 15 false and misleading and violates California consumer protection statutes. Presently before the 16 Court is Walgreens’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.