Legal Opinion
Sofich v. Hill
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1977No. 84991, SC 24339PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MENGLER, J., Pro Tempore.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover damages for personal injury-arising out of an automobile collision.
The court failed to give two instructions requested by the defendant. The first was based on the provisions of former ORS 483.642, and read as follows:
"I instruct you that under Oregon Law a blood alcohol percentage of .10 percent by weight supports a disputable presumption that the person was then under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
The second was based on the provisions of former ORS 483.992(2), and read as follows:
"I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Robbins v. CONSOLIDATED FRGHTWYS. CORP. OF DEL.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Resser v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Resser v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978