Legal Opinion

K.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 2007No. 4D07-2238PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

K.M. petitions for habeas relief from indirect criminal contempt of a valid court order. We grant the petition.

K.M. appeared before the trial court for a first appearance on a violation of probation. During the hearing, the court stated that it would take K.M. into custody for indirect criminal contempt of a valid court order, i.e., breaching the curfew set in his probation disposition. The court did not follow the procedures for an indirect criminal contempt hearing set forth in Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.150 or section 985.037, Florida Statutes. Rather, the court asked K.M.’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. MW v. LofthiemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. KM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. A.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Alan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. F.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API