Legal Opinion

Bly v. McAllister

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1961No. 35720PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This case poses the question of whether negligence is a necessary element in establishing the liability of the owner of livestock for their trespass upon the land of another in a “stock restricted area.” The question arises in consequence of the depredations of a Hereford bull in a herd of registered Aberdeen Angus.

To a court harassed with urgent constitutional problems relating to urban renewal, racial discrimination, financing of toll bridges, due process, and when the right to counsel begins, this is a pastoral interlude. However, there being a substantial backlog of opinions waiting to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kobayashi v. StrangewayWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Scanlan v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Vacca v. Steer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Carver v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Kenney v. Walla Walla CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API